Credentials & Democratic Decline
‘People should be aware of what’s out there. And not believe what they read just because it’s written.’
Astro-turf creation expert ‘Sharepro’
The lack of imagination shown by the media and politicians about the upcoming inquiry into the Australian media is making my head hurt. How many more media proprietors and vested editorial interests will falsely equate a quality, free press with a commercial one when the examples of the BBC and ABC are staring them in the face? How many more journalists must we listen to, as they reel off numerous and significant problems with the way the media conducts itself, before sighing that nothing can be done? Isn’t the sustained analysis of an inquiry precisely what you need to know to decide what can or should be done? And if so, can someone please, please make all those insisting we have to know what an inquiry will conclude for it to be justified go away?
Terribly academic of me I know, but then, I am an academic, with the life scars of a completed Masters and Doctoral degree to prove it. Which gives me a vested interest in the argument I want to make about the importance of suitably-qualified transparently-labelled experts participating in national policy debates. But I’m going to say it anyway, because no one else is talking about the credentialing issue, which is an important corner of the truly zeitgeist discussion about Australia’s democratic decline.
This article is only available to subscribers.
Subscriptions are amazingly cheap and completely worth it.
Not yet a subscriber? View subscription options
Already Subscribed? Login
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





















